My Photo
Name:
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Writer/Curator/Founder of The Autism Acceptance Project. Contributing Author to Between Interruptions: Thirty Women Tell the Truth About Motherhood, and Concepts of Normality by Wendy Lawson, and soon to be published Gravity Pulls You In. Writing my own book. Lecturer on autism and the media and parenting. Current graduate student Critical Disability Studies and most importantly, mother of Adam -- a new and emerging writer.

“There is no hope unmingled with fear, and no fear unmingled with hope.” -- Baruch Spinoza  

Saturday, September 22, 2007

 

Another Autism "Story" -- Jenny McCarthy



I am in the grocery store line, and yes, I heard that Jenny went on Oprah to talk about how diet and biomed "cured" her autistic child (who still flaps by the way). "Fighting for her Autistic Son," says the People Magazine headline. My stomach clenches. Oh no, I should be used to this by now, I think. Another "devastating" article that talks about autism as a disease -- that can be cured with medications and therapies. I sigh. I reluctantly buy it -- like a compulsion. I would prefer to ignore it. I can't.

The story starts off the same. Every parent is shocked, worried, faces fear. The beginnings of our stories are almost always universal, and there is nothing wrong in stating how something effects us. But, in the article, it doesn't really stop. We see the loving pictures -- son and mum look happy. Is this to show that you can love your child and still hate autism? Or is this to show that her son is "cured?" I am cringing while reading the saga, and the way its told -- could be People Magazine's fault in part. It is a gossip magazine, after all.

But here's where it really got to me. The interviewer asks about her relationship with Jim Carrey: "What about having children together?" To which she replies:

"[Exhaling] Let me take a drink of water on this. I'm done having children. I always thought I'd have at least four or five. But I got my a-- kicked."

Well I'm sorry, Jenny. You really lost me there.What do you think all the autistic adults think about that statement? Did you consider how you made an entire group of people FEEL? How would you like your mother to say that with you, she got her "a-- kicked?"

As a mom with five children, and four of them step children, they are a blessing. Adam is a gift and everyone of his brothers and sisters will agree. You can read Max's take on Adam in an essay he wrote nearly two years ago now: From Adam's World To Mine. Max is now a one-to-one for older autistic children at camp.

Adam has made our lives richer by showing us that we can, without difference and disability, often be living in our own little worlds, our boxes, our arrogance. Our willingness to open up to possibilities, and to learn from Adam and other like him, enables him to succeed and us to become larger. Adam is beginning to speak sentences, even though he does not speak much, and other days can't speak at all. He can spell, he is aware, and he is --God forbid -- autistic. Jenny's child is the same age as Adam. Adam could not do many of the things his same-aged peers did when he was two. But yes, even autistic kids grow and learn with love and support. Adam has had lots of support, but not always the typical kind we hear about. We struggled to find ways that specifically HE would benefit from -- and we had to weed through various therapies and therapists to make it work. Today, his teachers are commenting that he can do many things that the other kids cannot! While I agree with support, I also know that autistic kids learn which is why, at five, we might be hearing that kids are "cured," when they really are still autistic and learning.

As I said, I have no issues with parents who want to relay difficulties and challenges and be honest with how they feel. I do have difficulty in preaching unfounded methods, insulting a community of people by stating autism is "horrible," without qualifying that "horror" -- is it really within the person who says it? Perhaps this reflects a need for more self-reflection instead of blame.

I am also uncomfortable with separating autism from the person -- because while there are challenges in being any kind of minority, in this case a person with a disability, we should not undermine individuals just because they have a disability. We have to acknowledge that human experience is, in part, defined by who and what we are. I see parents who always want to separate that -- autism is just a label. Of course we are more than our "label." Yet it's more complex than this. The architecture of our lives is effected by both our environments and the way we were born. So why are people really saying this? Because they believe autism is awful? Because they are afraid of the stigma? I am always curious why people think they can separate autism completely from the person. We can't take deafness away from the deaf person and the way deafness influences their experience the world. We can't do it for blindness, physical or any other disability.

Now, let me conclude that I wonder if Jenny would still have children if she saw this video: Neurotypicalism Every Day by Christschool. Of course, it is a response to Autism Every Day, the unfortunate and poorly thought-out Autism Speaks' video. It just goes to show that if you put a certain kind of lens on something, you can yield a certain kind of result. Typical children look "horrible" to me here. They have melt-downs and geez -- parents get divorced over them. If I saw this video, I would NEVER want to have a neurotypical child:


Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

 

Two Wrights Make a Big Wrong





If you caught Larry King Live tonight, you’ll be battoning down the hatches: watch out, beware, autism is a big big scare. If you believe in fairy tales and the big bad witch, autism is going to come and take your precious sons.

There is was again, a bumbling Bill Cosby stumbling over his words, “a point that was missed is that there is no eye contact,” he explained, “like they’re not even in the room.”

Toni Braxton shed her tears for her five year old son, the same age as my Adam. “Autism Speaks reached out to me,” she said. “I’m so grateful that they did.” Honey, don’t you know that Autism Speaks is reaching out to every glitterati they know who has an autistic member of the family? Don’t you know that you mean big profile and bucks for them? It sounds like Toni needs some real support. Her son is truly gorgeous, smiling in his picture.

And hey, weren't all the kids smiling, by the way -- these tragic, pitiful examples of humanity stolen by autism? Please.

And where were these wonderful kids? Where were the autistic adults? Hmm. Isn't it curious that Autism Speaks speaks without autistic people present?

And then there were those increased “incidence” figures again. That epidemic rise in autism numbers that even the CDC had to explain that the incidence of autism hasn’t increased.

And then there was that 40-60 hour a week “prescription” for our kids – that this is the only way to beat the autism out of the child. No wonder they are crying. Who wants to live like that? No child needs this kind of "intervention." It's not proven and it's torture.

And yet, any progress that an autistic child displays is BECAUSE, they wish to claim, because of their interventions without acknowledging that kids develop, all kids develop, even autistic kids develop, no matter what.

Tailored programs, loving programs is what we need -- a humane understanding of autism as part of a person. Our kids require assistance, for sure, but they also need to be appreciated as autistic people. Our kids are not possessed. Autistic kids display eye contact at times, and sometimes they cannot because it is painful, not because “they are not even there.” They certainly have empathy and plenty of it. Adam may not come and say "mommy what's wrong," but he sure knows when something's wrong. Just because he doesn't give me the typical response, does not mean that I assume he has no empathy! The day he tells me, or types it out and he may reveal more than I ever imagined about his ability to perceive and understand many things.

Please stop demonizing autistic people. They are real people. When we went to the bookstore the other day, and Adam wanted to hop over to a set of books, two women stopped and stared and whispered “autism,” like it was a dirty word. Is this what Adam has to look forward by the continued work of Autism Speaks? Does Adam get to look forward to a world that thinks he is not there, that they can say or do things because they think he doesn’t know and understand? Does he really deserve the poor quality of services he will end up receiving because of such horrible stereotypes? This is what selling autism does to autistic people. It destroys not "the autism," but the very person they believe isn't quite human, or not "with" us. It destroys the human spirit.

It’s time to end the hysteria and begin the work. It’s harder to accommodate than to kill autism or shall we say, the autistic person.

Autism Speaks does not speak for us.

You can also listen to a podcast where I raise the considerations in how we represent autism on Autism Podcast.

Labels: , ,